Group/Individual Level

Facilitating structures - Innovator analysis

Another structure for fulfilment is an innovator analysis. Although this is not as simple and as structured as an innovation analysis, it is important that you consider the people who will be required to be accepting the innovation or technical change. In this section, we will consider three topics and an introduction to the Individual Innovator Questionnaire:


A primary distinction
First, let us simply distinguish between two groups of people: (1) people who are innovators and generally willing to adopt new technology and to make changes, and (2) people who are not.

  1. Research has shown that innovators, people who consider the task being computerised as very important, people whose task-related skills are high, and people who are high performers, are more inclined to adopt an innovation, even without significant management support, if it is simply made available to them. Implementation planning should concentrate on how to make the technology available to these people quickly and efficiently.

  2. Other employees, however, will await managerial directives before adopting the innovation. Therefore, managers should focus on providing and advertising an adequate infrastructure supporting the innovation for these people. Managers should then turn their attention directly to motivating reluctant adopters by making it very clear that the innovation or new technology is here to stay and will be used. This may be done by letting people know that its use will in some way be rewarded, required or mandated. Managers should make concrete attempts to motivate this second group of people to change.
In this way, people who perceive a high need, or who are skilled enough and innovative enough, will adopt the new technology as it diffuses via word-of-mouth and as a result of easy access. However, for as much as half of the population, providing access is not enough; they will await the managerial message before changing.

A more sophisticated classification of people's tendencies toward innovation adoption is discussed next. Whether you choose to take a simple or more complex look at those involved, you should consider how best to tailor your implementation to meet their needs.

Top of Page.


Adopter Categories
All individuals and organisations adapt to change at different rate and in different ways. This has led to the classification of groups of people and firms based on when they first begin using a new idea or a new technology. The method of individual adopter categorisation proposed by Rogers (1962) is very widely used and can be applied to organisations as well as individuals.

The point of this categorisation it is to highlight that you will need different strategies and implementation plans for various groups of people. Rogers' method of adopter categorisation is founded on statistical assumptions regarding the normal distribution. The five adopter categories are said to divide a normal adopter distribution into classifications resulting in standardised percentages of people in each category.

A great deal of research has illustrated that the adoption of an innovation over time can be represented as a normal distribution, when the ratio of people adopting during each time period is plotted.

 4-bInn.gif (2682 bytes)

We see that the frequency of adoption is low at the beginning, it begins to accelerate until it hits its peak, then begins to slow down again.

 

4-badopt.gif (2828 bytes)

Please remember that these adopter categorisations are generalisations. They are rules-of-thumb that help us think about broad classifications of people and groups. There are no pronounced breaks in the innovativeness continuum between each of the five categories and, their boundaries are loosely defined and overlapping.

The following is a summary of the dominant characteristics and values of each adopter category and a discussion of related implementation issues:

The innovators are characterised as being venturesome. The innovative firms and individuals have substantial financial resources, the ability to cope with a high degree of uncertainty, and are eager to try new ideas. These people and organisations are risk takers. They are willing to accept an occasional setback or loss. When planning your implementation strategy, these people are your easiest "sell." If it is new and there are potential benefits, these people are ready to try it out.

Early adopters are a key group. Whereas innovators are cosmopolitan in terms of social relations, early adopters have more local connections. This category has the greatest degree of opinion leaders (opinion leaders are discussed in more detail below). Later adopters view these early adopters as the people to check with before using a new idea or technology. Early adopters are close enough to the main-stream to act as role models, they are respected and are the embodiment of successful and discrete use of new ideas. This is a key group in terms of your implementation strategy. Winning-over these people can be done with careful planning and consideration. If you fail to sway them in your favour, however, it could be catastrophic to your efforts.

The early majority are deliberate. They are just ahead of the statistically average adopter. They follow with deliberate willingness in adopting innovations, but seldom lead. They follow the innovators' and early adopters' lead. Once they have fallen in line, it is almost impossible to stop the innovation from taking hold. Your implementation planning must take into account several facts related to this group. First, once you start implementing to this group, you will experience a significant increase in numbers. That is, by the time you get to this group, you will have influenced somewhere between 16% and 50% of your population. Second, this is the first of the groups who are not naturally inclined to try something new, simply because it is something new. Finally, when you begin to get this group on side, you know things are going well as you are starting to reach a "critical mass" in terms of numbers.

The late majority are often sKeptics. They approach innovations and change with caution, most frequently in response to economic necessity or other pressures. They frequently have scarce resources and respond when almost all of the uncertainty about the innovation has been removed. This is the first of the two groups that will take up most of your time and energy. In order to win them over, you must reduce their uncertainty by providing a sound financial case and by showing them how the technology works in other parts of your organisation or in other organisations. They will probably be afraid of making a mistake or taking a wrong decision. You must plan for and deal with the fact that they are somewhat motivated by fear. You may have to adopt strategies for this group that are significantly different from the strategies you have devised for previous groups.

The laggards are traditionalists. They have totally local and somewhat isolated social networks. They are the last to adopt the innovation. Some people refer to this group as the Dinosaurs. Decisions are typically made in relation to what has been done in the past. They are suspicious of innovation and of change agents. They resist change, have scarce resources, and must be certain a new idea will not fail before adopting it. This is the implementor's challenge group. They may be the 20% of users that require 80% of your efforts. They are frequently motivated out of fear. They do not want to make mistakes. You must be willing to move very slowly with people in this group.

Top of Page.


Opinion Leaders
Opinion leaders are individuals who lead by informally influencing opinions, attitudes, and/or behaviours about innovations. They convey information that decreases the uncertainty about the use of a new idea. Opinion leaders activate diffusion networks. They are considered part of a two-step flow model of mass communication. Communication messages are said to flow from a source (first step), via media channels to opinion leaders, who in turn pass them on to followers (second step).

It is important to be able to identify opinion leaders for several reasons. As people concerned with the successful diffusion of technical innovations, opinion leaders can be among your greatest allies or your major obstacles. As part of a diffusion strategy, you may choose to give opinion leaders special attention by involving them early, getting their support, and/or giving them early opportunities with the innovation.

Opinion leaders are characterised by the following types of activities and attributes:

Again, please remember that these are generalisations.

Take some time to think about your work place. Who are the likely opinion leaders concerning innovation and new technology in your group, department or firm? Ask yourself the following types of questions:

After you have identified these people, make a note of them and remember them. They can be your greatest allies the next time you need to innovate or to make some technical changes.

Top of Page.


Individual Innovator Questionnaire
The Individual Innovator Questionnaire will help you assess an individual's  personal ability to be innovative, and understand the criteria that can help them overcome barriers.

By completing the questionnaire, you can get an indication of where an individual might fit within the innovator model.

[Click here to access the Individual Innovator Questionnaire]

 


Copyright © 1999,2000 Holistic Management Pty. Ltd.